Below are two documents from 2013:
- THE FUTURE OF DRONES IN AMERICA: LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PRIVACY CONSIDERATIONS
- Drones in Domestic Surveillance Operations: Fourth Amendment Implications and Legislative Responses
FAA UAS Roadmap - the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-95) mandated the creation and publication of a 5-year Roadmap for the FAA's process of developing regulations, policy, procedures, guidance material, and training requirements to support safe and efficient UAS operations in the NAS, while coordinating with relevant departments and agencies to address related key policy areas of concern such as privacy and national security.
FAA Order: 8900.313 - Education, Compliance, and Enforcement of Unauthorized Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations - issued August 4, 2015 - cancelled March 31, 2016
8000.372A - UAS Designated Airworthiness Representatives (DAR) for UAS Certfication at UAS Test Sites
FAA Order 8110.4C - Type Certification
FAA Order 8130.2H - Airworthiness Certification of Products and Articles
The US Army Training Circular 3-04.61 - UAS Commander's Guide and Aircrew Training Manual
The US Army Training Circular 3-04.62 - Small UAS Aircrew Training Program
The US Army Training Circular 3-04.63 - MQ-1C UAS Commander's Aircrew Training Program and Aircrew Training Manual
The US Army Techniques Publication (ATP) 5-19 - Risk Management
Below (for download) is the DoD UAS Group Descriptions and the DoD Airspace Integration Plan
JO 7210.873 - Unmanned Aircraft Operations in the National Airspace System (NAS) - cancelled July 11, 2015
to be replaced on November 25, 2015 by JO7210.891 - Unmanned Aircraft Operations the National Airspace System
What Is The DoT IG Doing Issuing It’s Own Video on the FAA's UAS Rules and Enforcement? - JDA Journal
Attorney says FAA UAS law enforcement guidelines off target - UAS Magazine Article
Memo to law enforcement by the FAA (download below)
October 29, 2015
Nancy Egan – 3D Robotics
Richard Hanson – Academy of Model Aeronautics
George Novak – Aerospace Industries Association
Chuck Hogeman and Randy Kenagy – Air Line Pilots Association
Jim Coon – Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association
Sean Cassidy – Amazon Prime Air
Ben Gielow – Amazon Retail
Justin Towles – American Association of Airport Executives
Brian Wynne – Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems International
Parker Brugge – Best Buy
Douglas Johnson – Consumer Electronics Association
Brendan Schulman – DJI
Paul Feldman – General Aviation Manufacturers Association
Dave Vos – GoogleX (Co-Chair)
Tony Bates – GoPro
Matt Zuccaro – Helicopter Association International
Mike Fergus – International Association of Chiefs of Police
John Perry – Management Association for Private Photogrammetric Surveyors
Brandon Declet – Measure
Randall Burdett – National Association of State Aviation Officials
Sarah Wolf – National Business Aviation Association
Baptiste Tripard – Parrot
Tyler Collins – PrecisionHawk
Gregory McNeal – Small UAV Coalition
Thomas Head – Walmart
October 28, 2015
US Senate Committee on Appropriations
Subcommittee Hearing to review unmanned aircraft systems and the step being taken to successfully integrate this technology into our National Airspace System
Transportation, Housing & Urban Development: Integrating Unmanned Aircraft Systems Technology into the National Airspace System (Senator Susan Collins, Chairman)
The Honorable Michael P. Huerta - Administrator - FAA
Mr. Marty Rogers - Deputy Director - Alliance for system Safety of UAS through Research Excellence
Captain Tim Canoll - President - Air Line Pilots Association International
The FAA is providing the following updated information regarding the Small UAS Registration and Marking interim final rule as a result of a recent decision (PDF) by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit regarding the small UAS registration program.
The court's decision invalidated the registration requirement as it applies to certain model aircraft that meet the definitional and operational requirements provided in section 336 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act (PDF). Owners of model aircraft which are operated in compliance with section 336 are not required to register. Owners of all other small unmanned aircraft, including newly-purchased unmanned aircraft not operated exclusively in compliance with section 336, remain subject to the registration requirement. The FAA continues to encourage voluntary registration for all owners of small unmanned aircraft.
The FAA is working on a final rule with respect to registration and marking that will implement the court's decision. In the meantime, if you are an owner operating exclusively in compliance with section 336 and you wish to delete your registration and receive a refund of your registration fee, you may do so by accessing a registration deletion and self-certification form (PDF) and mailing it to the FAA at the address designated on the form. Owners who already received a refund during the initial grace period are not eligible to receive a refund. This form has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for approval of the information collection.
Please continue to check this website for further updates. To register your small unmanned aircraft, visit the registration portal.
October 19, 2015
Clarification of the Applicability of Aircraft Registration Requirements for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and Request for Information Regarding Electronic Registration for UAS - October 22, 2015
November 21, 2015
December 21, 2015 - Effective date - 14 CFR PART 48—REGISTRATION AND MARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT
December 21, 2015 - Effective date - Register your small UAS for hobby or recreational use - for more information refer to the explanation and registering for commercial use under part 47
Dec 22, 2015 - FAA released FAA Order 8900.338 - New Requirements for Registering and Marking Small Unmanned Aircraft
December 14, 2015 - FAA announces small UAS Registration Rule
- Registration is a statutory requirement that applies to all aircraft
- Applies to small UAS weighing 0.55lb (250g) up to less than 55lb (25kg) including payload e.g. camera
- Registration begins Dec 21, 2015
- First 30 days are free (till Jan 20, 2016) then $5
- Must register no later than Feb 19, 2016 if UAS was previously operated prior to Dec 21, 2015
- Must register before first flight outdoors if UAS purchased after Dec 21, 2015
- Must be 13 years of age to register (parent/guardian must register for younger children)
- Streamlined and user-friendly web-based aircraft registration process
- Link for registration at www.faa.gov/uas/registration
- Provide NAME, HOME ADDRESS, EMAIL
- Certificate of Aircraft Registration/Proof of Ownership includes ID Number for UAS owner and this ID number must be marked on UAS
- Hobby/recreational users must only register once for all their models and use the same ID number which will be valid for 3 years
February 4, 2016 - UAS Magazine - Patrick Miller - Getting Our UAS Priorities Straight
February 2, 2016 - HR 4432 - The Commercial UAS Modernization Act
- Was introduced in the House of Representatives and thereafter referred to House Science, Space, and Technology (download below).
- To establish an interim rule for the operation of small unmanned aircraft for commercial purposes, and for other purposes.
- To amend the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (PL 112-95).
- To add Section 337 - Operation of small unmanned aircraft for commercial purposes - dealing with lack of airworthiness certificates, liability insurance, registration, testing requirements now to include proficiency test as well as the original knowledge test, accident reporting now to be accomplished within 2 days of the accident.
- To add Section 338 - Micro UAS Operations - for UAS weighing up to 4.4lbs - limit of 400 feet AGL, VLOS, daylight, 5SM of an airport, exemption from airmen certification and airworthiness standards.
- To add Section 339 - Deputy Associate Administrator for Unmanned Aircraft whose duties it shall be to create an achievable comprehensive research and development program for the safe integration of UAS in the NAS
- To add Section 4 - Joint Aircraft System Research and Development Data Collection and Analysis Program - at the William J. Hughes Technical Center:
1. For research on safety standards for detect and avoid, command and control, autonomous aircraft systems, and air traffic management for BLOS
2. Use of Test Sites
3. Air Traffic Management Pilot Program
May 13, 2015 - S 1314 - Commercial UAS Modernization Act - introduced by Senator Cory Booker.
This bill amends the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to permit a person to operate a small commercial unmanned aircraft (drone) without an airworthiness certificate within the United States for the period beginning on enactment of this Act and ending on the effective date of a final rule based on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking "Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems" dated February 23, 2015, subject to the following conditions and restrictions:
A drone may not be operated until the operator of a test site certifies that it meets the requirements in the rulemaking notice and can operate within the restrictions.
The owner or operator of a drone involved in an accident causing personal injury or property damage must report it to the FAA within two days after the accident.
The FAA shall:
March 14, 2016 - South by Southwest Press Event - FAA Administrator Huerta
Quotes from the speech: "Late last month, we announced that we are setting up an Aviation Rulemaking Committee to develop recommendations for how we can safely allow certain UAS to be operated with people below. Our goal is to create a performance-based regulatory framework that addresses potential hazards, rather than a classification that is based only on weight and speed."
"...we expect to have our small UAS rule finalized this spring. As most of you know, this rule will allow for routine commercial operations of small UAS within certain limitations. It will, for the most part, eliminate the need to issue Section 333 exemptions on a case-by-case basis, and it will open up access to the national airspace system while maintaining today’s high safety standards."
With respect to B4UFLY - "Today, I am pleased to announce that the Android version of the app will also be publicly available later today, also free of charge. There are currently more than 35,000 people using B4UFLY, almost all of them iOS users, but now users of virtually all smart phones will have access to it, which we believe will help heighten public awareness about what it means to fly unmanned aircraft safely. The Android version includes a lot of updates based on feedback from beta testers, like a much more user-friendly flight-planning feature."
February 24, 2016 - FAA Unveils Effort to Expand the Safe Integration of Unmanned Aircraft
The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is establishing an aviation rulemaking committee (PDF) with industry stakeholders to develop recommendations for a regulatory framework that would allow certain UAS to be operated over people who are not directly involved in the operation of the aircraft. The FAA is taking this action to provide a more flexible, performance-based approach for these operations than what was considered for Micro UAS. The committee will begin its work in March and issue its final report to the FAA on April 1.
Introduced in Senate - 3-3-2015
- Amends the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to direct the Secretary of Transportation to study and identify any potential threats to privacy protections posed by the integration of unmanned aircraft (drone) systems into the national airspace system, including any potential violations of privacy principles.
- Directs the Secretary to establish certain procedures to allow for civil operation in the national airspace system of small drone systems that do not meet expedited operational authorization requirements. Requires such procedures to ensure that the integration of drone systems into the national airspace system is done in compliance with privacy principles.
- Prohibits the Secretary from approving, issuing, or awarding any certificate, license, or other grant of authority to operate a drone system in the national airspace system unless the application for it includes a data collection statement, meeting certain requirements, that provides reasonable assurance that the applicant will operate the drone system in accordance with privacy principles. Applies the same privacy principles requirement to any drone system to be operated by a law enforcement agency or a law enforcement agency contractor or subcontractor, except that the application for it shall include a data minimization statement, meeting certain requirements, instead of a data collection statement.
- Directs the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to make any approved certificate, license, or other grant of authority, plus other specified information, available in a searchable format on the public FAA website.
- Prohibits a governmental entity from using a drone system, or requesting information or data collected by another entity through use of a drone system, for protective activities, or for law enforcement or intelligence purposes, except pursuant to a warrant issued using the procedures described in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (or, in the case of a state court, issued using state warrant procedures) by a court of competent jurisdiction, or as permitted under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. Makes an exception to this prohibition in exigent circumstances when a law enforcement entity reasonably believes there is: (1) an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury; or (2) a high risk of an imminent terrorist attack by a specific individual or organization, according to the Secretary of Homeland Security .
- Makes it unlawful to operate a drone system in a manner that is not in accordance with the terms of a data collection statement or in a manner violating any portion of the final rule for the procedures for civil operation of small drone systems required by this Act. Grants enforcement authority to the Federal Trade Commission .
- Authorizes a state to bring a civil action on behalf of state residents in state or U.S. district court for injunctive relief against violations of this Act or related regulations if the state attorney general has reason to believe that an interest of state residents has been or is threatened or adversely affected by a prohibited act or practice.
- Creates a private right of action in state or U.S. district court for persons injured by a prohibited act.
- Allows a suit against a governmental entity.
- Requires the FAA to revoke the certificate, license, or other grant of authority to operate a drone system operated in a prohibited manner.
- Declares that nothing in this Act may be construed to apply to model aircraft flown strictly for hobby or recreational purposes and meeting certain other criteria.
Introduced in House - 2-3-2016
contains UAS legislation
Sec. 431. Definitions.
Sec. 432. Codification of existing law; additional provisions.
Sec. 433. Unmanned aircraft test ranges.
Sec. 434. Unmanned aircraft systems senior leadership and staffing.
Sec. 435. Sense of Congress regarding unmanned aircraft safety.
Sec. 436. UAS privacy review.
Sec. 437. Public UAS operations by tribal governments.
Sec. 438. Facilitating unmanned aircraft authorization in support of firefighting operations.
Sec. 439. Low altitude unmanned aircraft system traffic management.
Sec. 440. UAS detection systems pilot program.
Sec. 441. Evaluation of aircraft registration for small unmanned aircraft.
April 6, 2016 - FAA reviewing micro UAS Report
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is currently reviewing the report and recommendations of the Micro Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Aviation Rulemaking Committee. The agency had tasked the group to develop recommendations for performance-based regulations that would let certain unmanned aircraft operate over people not directly involved in the flight of the aircraft. The rulemaking committee, which began meeting March 8, worked under a tight deadline of April 1 to deliver its report. The task force included a diverse set of aviation stakeholders, including UAS manufacturers, UAS operators, consensus standards organizations, researchers and academics. The ARC’s consensus report recommends establishing four small UAS categories, defined primarily by risk of injury to people below the flight path. For each category, the group recommends assigning a potential risk linked to either weight or impact energy. The report also addresses operational restrictions and standards to minimize the risks associated with each category. The FAA will use the information in the report to develop a flexible, performance-based proposed rule. The public will have an opportunity to comment on the proposal based on the ARC’s recommendations. See the document below
May 4, 2016 - FAA made two announcements today
On July 15, 2016, President Obama signed into law H.R. 636, the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 (“the Act,” Pub.L. 114-190). The Act extends the authorization of the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA”) programs and taxes to fund those programs through September 30, 2017, at current funding levels. The Act also includes new and amended provisions related to integrating commercial small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“sUAS”), a.k.a. “drones,” into the National Airspace System (“NAS”). This alert highlights the provisions of the Act related to safety, security, and drones.
Download the Act below
Know where to fly
Authority: 36 CFR 1.5
The term "unmanned aircraft" means a device that is used or intended to be used for flight in the air without the possibility of direct human intervention from within or on the device, and the associated operational elements and components that are required for the pilot or system operator in command to operate or control the device (such as cameras, sensors, communication links). This term includes all types of devices that meet this definition (e.g., model airplanes, quadcopters, drones) that are used for any purpose, including for recreation or commerce.
Launching, landing, or operating an unmanned aircraft from or on lands and waters administered by the National Park Service within the boundaries of [insert name of park] is prohibited except as approved in writing by the superintendent.
Policy Memorandum 14-05 (“Unmanned Aircraft – Interim Policy”) requires all superintendents to insert closure language in the park compendium prohibiting launching, landing, or operating unmanned aircraft from or on lands and waters administered by the National Park Service (NPS), subject to the exceptions and conditions described in the Policy Memorandum.
One of those exceptions, listed in paragraph 1(d) of the Policy Memorandum (see Conditions and Exceptions), allows for activities under a special use permit (SUP) that specifically authorizes launching, landing, or operating an unmanned aircraft and that is approved in writing by the Associate Director, Visitor and Resource Protection (ADVRP).
SUPs that permit launching, landing, or operating unmanned aircraft from or on lands or waters administered by the NPS should clearly identify the designated area(s) for these activities within the park. SUPs should also contain appropriate terms and conditions to ensure safe operation of unmanned aircraft and mitigate any unacceptable impacts to the resources and values of the park.
In addition to the standard SUP conditions included on all permits, the following conditions are required:
- Unmanned aircraft may not disturb or harass wildlife.
- Unmanned aircraft may not interfere with NPS search and rescue, law enforcement, or other emergency operations.
- Unmanned aircraft will not be flown in a reckless manner or outside the designated area(s).
- Operators may not operate unmanned aircraft while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
- Inexperienced unmanned aircraft operators must be accompanied and assisted by an experienced operator.
- Operators must avoid flying directly over people, vessels, vehicles, or structures and must avoid endangering the life and property of others.
- Operators must report all accidents involving injury (even minor first aid) and any resource or property damage to the NPS immediately. Notification to the NPS does not relieve the operator from reporting requirements under 49 CFR 830 or under a Certificate of Authorization (COA) required by the FAA.
- Unmanned aircraft must be within visual sight, with no visual aids authorized, of the operator at all times during flight of the unmanned aircraft.
- Operators must have sufficient liability insurance or proof of membership in an organization such as the Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) which includes insurance coverage with membership.
Optional conditions to consider (select as appropriate; may be revised based upon individual park needs):
see brochure below - violation is a misdemeanor with maximum penalty of 6 months in jail and $5,000 fine
Navigable airspace - 49 USC 40102(a)(32) - "navigable airspace" means airspace above the minimum altitudes of flight prescribed by regulations under this subpart and subpart III of this part, including airspace needed to ensure safety in the takeoff and landing of aircraft.
David Zablidowsky arrested for flying his personal UAS over Manhattan - his device crashed outside Grand Central Station, and while no one was injured, NYPD cited him for second degree "reckless endangerment."
On June 19, 2014, National Park Service Director Jonathon B. Jarvis signed Policy Memorandum 14–05, Unmanned Aircraft – Interim Policy. Its purpose was “to ensure that the use of unmanned aircraft is addressed in a consistent manner by the NPS before a significant level of such use occurs within the National Park System.” Each superintendent was directed “to use the authority under 36 CFR 1.5 to close units of the National Park System to launching, landing, or operating unmanned aircraft…” This policy is still in place and the public may not use unmanned aircraft in the national parks.
PUBLIC AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS (PAO)
Differ from civil aircraft operations in that "the FAA has no regulatory authority over PAO other than those requirements that apply to all aircraft operating in the" National Airspace System" (NAS)
49 USC 40102(a) - Definitions
(41) “public aircraft” means any of the following:
(A) Except with respect to an aircraft described in subparagraph (E), an aircraft used only for the United States Government, except as provided in section 40125(b).
(B) An aircraft owned by the Government and operated by any person for purposes related to crew training, equipment development, or demonstration, except as provided in section 40125(b).
(C) An aircraft owned and operated by the government of a State, the District of Columbia, or a territory or possession of the United States or a political subdivision of one of these governments, except as provided in section 40125(b).
(D) An aircraft exclusively leased for at least 90 continuous days by the government of a State, the District of Columbia, or a territory or possession of the United States or a political subdivision of one of these governments, except as provided in section 40125(b).
(E) An aircraft owned or operated by the armed forces or chartered to provide transportation or other commercial air service to the armed forces under the conditions specified by section 40125(c). In the preceding sentence, the term “other commercial air service” means an aircraft operation that (i) is within the United States territorial airspace; (ii) the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration determines is available for compensation or hire to the public, and (iii) must comply with all applicable civil aircraft rules under title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.
49 USC 40125 - Qualifications for public aircraft status
(a) Definitions.-In this section, the following definitions apply:
(1) Commercial purposes.-The term "commercial purposes" means the transportation of persons or property for compensation or hire, but does not include the operation of an aircraft by the armed forces for reimbursement when that reimbursement is required by any Federal statute, regulation, or directive, in effect on November 1, 1999, or by one government on behalf of another government under a cost reimbursement agreement if the government on whose behalf the operation is conducted certifies to the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration that the operation is necessary to respond to a significant and imminent threat to life or property (including natural resources) and that no service by a private operator is reasonably available to meet the threat.
(2) Governmental function.-The term "governmental function" means an activity undertaken by a government, such as national defense, intelligence missions, firefighting, search and rescue, law enforcement (including transport of prisoners, detainees, and illegal aliens), aeronautical research, or biological or geological resource management.
(3) Qualified non-crewmember.-The term "qualified non-crewmember" means an individual, other than a member of the crew, aboard an aircraft-
(A) operated by the armed forces or an intelligence agency of the United States Government; or
(B) whose presence is required to perform, or is associated with the performance of, a governmental function.
(4) Armed forces.-The term "armed forces" has the meaning given such term by section 101 of title 10.
(b) Aircraft Owned by Governments.-An aircraft described in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of section 40102(a)(41) does not qualify as a public aircraft under such section when the aircraft is used for commercial purposes or to carry an individual other than a crewmember or a qualified non-crewmember.
(c) Aircraft Owned or Operated by the Armed Forces.-
(1) In general.-Subject to paragraph (2), an aircraft described in section 40102(a)(41)(E) qualifies as a public aircraft if-
(A) the aircraft is operated in accordance with title 10;
(B) the aircraft is operated in the performance of a governmental function under title 14, 31, 32, or 50 and the aircraft is not used for commercial purposes; or
(C) the aircraft is chartered to provide transportation or other commercial air service to the armed forces and the Secretary of Defense (or the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating) designates the operation of the aircraft as being required in the national interest.
(2) Limitation.-An aircraft that meets the criteria set forth in paragraph (1) and that is owned or operated by the National Guard of a State, the District of Columbia, or any territory or possession of the United States, qualifies as a public aircraft only to the extent that it is operated under the direct control of the Department of Defense.
(d) Search and Rescue Purposes.-An aircraft described in section 40102(a)(41)(D) that is not exclusively leased for at least 90 continuous days by the government of a State, the District of Columbia, or a territory or possession of the United States or a political subdivision of 1 of those governments, qualifies as a public aircraft if the Administrator determines that-
(1) there are extraordinary circumstances;
(2) the aircraft will be used for the performance of search and rescue missions;
(3) a community would not otherwise have access to search and rescue services; and
(4) a government entity demonstrates that granting the waiver is necessary to prevent an undue economic burden on that government.
(Added Pub. L. 106–181, title VII, §702(b)(1), Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 155 ; amended Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title X, §1078(b), (c), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 334 ; Pub. L. 112–141, div. C, title V, §35003, July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 843 .)
2012-Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 112–141 added subsec. (d).
2008-Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110–181, §1078(c)(1), substituted "section 40102(a)(41)" for "section 40102(a)(37)".
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 110–181, §1078(c)(2), substituted "section 40102(a)(41)(E)" for "section 40102(a)(37)(E)" in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (c)(1)(C). Pub. L. 110–181, §1078(b), inserted "or other commercial air service" after "transportation".
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–141 effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of Title 23, Highways.
Section applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1999, see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–181, set out as an Effective Date of 2000 Amendments note under section 106 of this title.
For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
DRONE brings us inside the covert CIA drone war. The film follows people who live under drones in Pakistan and drone pilots who struggle with the new warfare. Watch the trailer below!
March 10, 2015 - Paul Denton, Chief of Police, Ohio State University - Drones on Campus: 10 Challenges to Consider
April 5, 2015 - Risk, Product Liability Trends, Triggers, and Insurance in Commercial Aerial Robots - by David K. Beyer, Donna A. Dulo, Gale A. Townsle, and Stephen S. Wu.
April 5, 2014 - Considerations of a legal framework for the safe and resilient operation of autonomous aerial robots - by Cameron R. Cloar and Donna A. Dulo.
Also by Donna A. Dulo is an article appearing in Unmanned Systems - UAS in the National Airspace: Aerial Goldmine or Legal Landmine?
An article appearing in SciTech Lawyer Volume 9, by Donna A. Dulo, Christoper S. Lee, Cameron Cloar, and Jeewon Kim - UAS: Mobility on the Edge
Privacy, Restriction, and Regulation Involving
Federal, State and Local Legislation: More Hurdles
for Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Integration?
David C. Ison
Embry Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide , email@example.com
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide , firstname.lastname@example.org
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide
July 3, 2014 - Memo from Mark W. Bury, Assistant Chief Counsel for International Law, Legislation and Regulations, AGC-200 to FAA, James Williams, Manager, UAS Integration Office, AFS-80
Relating to Operation of UAS as Public Aircraft for Educational Purposes (see below)
September 24, 2015 - Memo from the FAA regarding Guidance on Use of Drones by Texas School Districts and Charters (see further below).
February 2, 2015 - Article appearing in Business Law Today - Seeking Law Abiding Drones: What to tell clients that want to use drones in their business
Bill Thompson - ERAU - Lift- Off the Page - Developing UAS - watch the video below
Unmanned Aircraft systems Security Society - Paul DeBone - Security: The Critical Missing Link in Civilian Drone Operations
January 22, 2015 - Pirker, FAA settle penalty for alleged unsafe drone operation
November 18, 2014 - Michael P. Huerta v. Raphael Pirker - Docket CP-217 Opinion (see below)
and then the decisional order (see further below).
November 19, 2015 - King & Spalding - Client Alert - NTSB finds that drones are "aircraft" under Federal Law
FAA documents for download below:
- Interim Operational Approval Guidance 08-01 - Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations in the US National Airspace- March 13, 2008
- Federal Register Volume 72, Number 29 - February 13, 2007 - document to clarify the FAA's current policy concerning operations of UAS in the NAS
- Memo - September 16, 2005 - Interim Operational Approval Guidance for operations of UAS in the NAS
How should states regulate drones and aerial surveillance? by David L. Hudson Jr. - American Bar Association Journal - February 1, 2015
On August 13, 2014, the FAA announced that the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University's unmannned aircraft systems (UAS) test site program was ready to conduct research vital to integrating UAS into the nation's airspace. The site is the last of 6 nationwide to be declared operational. The FAA granted Virginia Tech 7 Certificates of Waiver or Authorization (COAs) for 2 years. Virginia Tech is a member of the Mid-Atlantic Aviation Partnership (MAAP) consisting of academia, government, industry, economic development agencies, and non-profit organizations throughout Virginia, New Jersey, and Maryland.
The FAA first authorized use of unmanned aircraft in the National Airspace System (NAS) in 1990.
Today, unmanned aircraft are flying in the NAS under very controlled conditions, performing border and port surveillance by the Department of Homeland Security, helping with scientific research and environmental monitoring by NASA and NOAA, supporting public safety by law enforcement agencies, helping state universities conduct research, and supporting various other missions for public (government) entities. Operations range from ground level to above 50,000 feet, depending on the specific type of aircraft. However, UAS operations are currently not authorized in Class B airspace, which exists over major urban areas and contains the highest density of manned aircraft in the National Airspace System.
Thomson-Wimmer Inc. is changing the way companies do business by changing how they see unmanned aircraft technology!
February 2015 - Harvard Law School - National Security Journal - Drones in the US National Airspace System: A Safety and Security Assessment
Domestic Drones and Privacy: A Primer - a paper written by the Congressional Research Service on March 2015 (download below)
FAA on Aviation-Related Videos or Other Electronic Media on the Internet
This notice provides guidance to aviation safety inspectors (ASI) regarding actions to be taken when notified of videos or other electronic media posted to the Internet depicting the operation of aircraft in the National Airspace System (NAS) that may be contrary to Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) or statute.
UAS videos, in particular, are increasingly appearing on the Internet. UAS videos may depict aircraft being flown in a variety of classes of airspace and at varying altitudes. Inspectors are to follow the protocol below when receiving notification of videos with potentially noncompliant UAS operations posted to the Internet. This notice provides an outline and protocol for inspectors when initiating educational outreach. When responding to a notification that requires contact with a UAS operator, follow the guidance contained in FAA Notice N 8900.268, Education, Compliance, and Enforcement of Unauthorized Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operators (cancelled). If counseling in the form of an informational letter is warranted, send the UAS Informational Letter Template for Inspectors (see Appendix A). The letter must not be altered other than to fill in the appropriate address of the operator and FSDO along with your contact information and signature. If the educational outreach is ineffective in gaining compliance, the UAS operator is noncompliant or uncooperative, or the UAS operation resulted in a medium to high potential or actual endangerment to the NAS, the inspector is to continue their investigation as outlined in N 8900.268.
Note: N 8900.227, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS ) Operational Approval (cancelled)
Note: N 8900.292, Aviation-Related Videos or Other Electronic Media on the Internet is still available.
The memorandum (download below) dated May 5, 2015, addresses three issues concerning the use of unmanned aircraft for newsgathering: (1) whether members of the media may use unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for newsgathering; (2) whether the media may use pictures, video, or other infmmation collected by a person using UAS; and (3) whether a person who sells images collected by UAS would need
authorization for his or her operations.
Below is a webinar transcript in PDF by Brendan Schulman explaining the February 15, 2015 NPRM for sUAS
(a) Any person may petition the Associate Administrator for an extension of time to submit comments in response to a notice of proposed rulemaking. The petition shall be submitted in duplicate not less than three days before expiration of the time stated in the notice. The filing of the petition does not automatically extend the time for petitioner's comments.
(b) The Associate Administrator grants the petition only if the petitioner shows a substantive interest in the proposed rule and good cause for the extension, and if the extension is in the public interest. If an extension is granted, it is granted as to all persons and is published in the Federal Register.
[53 FR 11013, Apr. 4, 1988, as amended by Amdt. 404-2, 68 FR 35289, June 13, 2003]
The law is currently settled in the US that, "on the public street, or in any other public place, the plaintiff has no legal right to be alone; and it is no invasion of his privacy to do no more than follow him about and watch him there." Mark v. Seattle Times - 1981
DOT and FAA Propose New Rules for Small UAS - February 15, 2015
NPRM - Operation and Certification of small UAS - February 23, 2015
Comment on NPRM on UAS Operation and Certification before April 24, 2015
February 12, 2014 - Public use of UAS - Advisory Circular 00-1.1A - Public Aircraft Operations
Executive Order 13,272 - Proper Consideration of Small Entities, to further add on Small Business Administration notification requirements
Sarah Nilsson, JD, PhD, MAS
602 561 8665
You can also fill out my online form.
The information on this website is for educational purposes only and DOES NOT constitute legal advice. While the author of this website is an attorney, she is not your attorney, nor are you her client, until you enter into a written agreement with Nilsson Law, PLLC to provide legal services.